• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
facebook twitter youtube linkedin maps
Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele LLP logo   ≡ ╳
  • 770-429-1499
Menu   ≡ ╳
  • Firm Profile
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Captive Insurance Companies
    • Civil and Commercial Litigation
    • Commercial Real Estate, Zoning & Land Use
    • Corporate and Transactional Law
    • Employment Law
    • Estate Planning
    • Family Law
    • Insurance Defense
    • Probate Litigation
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Taxation
    • Workers’ Compensation
  • Locations
    • Brentwood TN
    • Jacksonville FL
    • Knoxville TN
    • Lexington KY
    • Marietta GA
    • Harrisburg PA
    • Orlando FL
    • Santa Rosa Beach FL
  • Videos
    • Associate Videos
    • FAQ’s & Webinars
    • Event Videos
    • Workers’ Compensation Videos (2018)
  • News
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Giving Back
    • Events
  • Publications
  • Clients
    • Results
    • MIJS Awards
    • Resources
  • Careers
    • A Great Place to Work
    • What It’s Like to Work There
    • What Associates Say
  • Contact

2020 Annual Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele Holiday Wine Tasting Canceled

By mijs

We hope you and your family are staying healthy and safe during the pandemic. Due to the pandemic, we’ve made the difficult decision to cancel our Annual Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele Holiday Wine Tasting. While we are disappointed we will not be able to spend time with you at the tasting, we know you will understand our reasons for cancelling this year’s event.  We hope to see many of you next summer for our Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele Annual Workers’ Compensation Seminar and for the 2021 Holiday Wine Tasting.

As always, thanks for allowing us to work with you in handling your legal needs.

Regards,

Robert Ingram
Bill Johnson
Rodney McColloch
Harry Tear
Kevin Carlock
Shane Mayes
Ryan Ingram

Filed Under: client alert, Latest News, News

Georgia Supreme Court Decision Limiting Employer’s Responsibility for Preexisting Conditions

By mijs

In the case of Ocmulgee EMT et al. v. McDuffie, S17G0038, decided 10/16/2017, the Georgia Supreme Court reversed a Court of Appeals decision that would have made employers responsible for preexisting conditions, even when the condition is not the cause of disability.

The Court of Appeals held that when an aggravation of a preexisting condition ceases, the employer must show availability of suitable employment in the workforce before suspending a claimant’s benefits.  However, the WC Act defines an “injury” to include aggravation of a preexisting condition but “only for so long as the aggravation of the preexisting continues to be the cause of the disability; the preexisting condition shall no longer meet this criteria when the aggravation ceases to be the cause of the disability …”

In this case, the claimant had received workers’ compensation benefits for several years for a compensable knee injury which he failed to disclose to the subsequent employer at the time of hiring.  The claimant eventually aggravated the preexisting condition, but two physicians eventually concluded that the aggravation had ceased and that the employee had returned to baseline for the preexisting knee injury.  The ALJ, WC Board, and Superior Court all held the employer was entitled to suspend benefits based upon the employee returning to baseline.  However, the Court of Appeals remanded the case holding that the employer must also show the availability of suitable employment in the workplace in addition to establishing that the employee had returned to baseline.  The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals quoting the definition of the injury, which makes it clear that the employer is only responsible for an aggravation of a preexisting condition “for so long as the aggravation of the preexisting condition continues to be the cause of the disability.”  The statute imposes no additional obligation for suspending benefits that suitable employment is available.

This is a big win for employers and insurers.  Below is a copy of the Supreme Court decision.

Georgia Supreme Court Decision Limiting Employer’s Responsibility for Preexisting Conditions from Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele, LLP

Filed Under: client alert, News

July 1, 2017 WC Georgia Rule Change: Beware of Petitions for Medical Treatment

By mijs

Georgia Workers’ Compensation Adjusters should be aware of a Rule change and a new form, which will require a quick decision to either controvert or authorize medical treatment/tests prescribed by an authorized treating physician.  Effective 7/1/2017, the WC Board amended Rule 205 to add subsection (c) authorizing use of the new form WC-PMT, which is attached.

This new WC-PMT (Petition for Medical Treatment) does not require submission of the form by the healthcare provider, as is done with a Form WC-205.  Instead, new Board Rule 205(c) allows the claimants and the claimants’ attorney to complete a Petition for Medical Treatment (WC-PMT) when:

1)      ATP has recommended medical treatment/testing;

2)      Employer/Insurer have been provided medical documentation confirming recommended medical treatment/testing for at least five (5) business days; and

3)      Employer/Insurer has failed to authorize the treatment/testing recommended by ATP.

When the foregoing three steps have been met, the employee or their attorney may file the WC-PMT, which will result in the issuance of a notice requiring the Employer/Insurer to participate in a telephonic conference before an ALJ so the Employer/Insurer has an opportunity to explain why the requested medical treatment/testing has not been authorized.  The telephonic conference will occur within 5 days from the date the petition is filed.

Employer/Insurer may authorize treatment/testing by completing WC-PMT Section C. or controvert treatment/testing by completing WC-PMT Section D.  Be sure to timely respond to WC-PMTs going forward.

Feel free to contact us with any questions.  If you need assistance in handling the conference calls, or in the alternative, would like our firm to handle the conference call for you, just give us a call.

Filed Under: client alert Tagged With: Marietta GA, Workers' Compensation

Client Alert: Lowndes County Liability Update

By mijs

$10 Million Judgment for “Rolling Stool Rolling”

All,

In an effort to keep you informed on both Georgia liability matters, and the ever increasing jury awards in Georgia, we would like to point you to a recent case that concluded in South Georgia.  A Lowndes County jury recently delivered an excessive post-apportionment award of seven million ($7,000.000.00) to a surgeon who suffered a head injury when he attempted to sit on a stool in the operating room in which he was working.  According to court filings, the middle aged physician had just completed a surgery, and was sitting down on the four-legged stool to write post-operative orders when the stool shot out from under him and he fell backward to the floor.  The physician, who had a very successful general practice and was a vascular specialist, had no recollection of the accident.  Plaintiff’s attorney claims that his client continues to suffer from seizures, cognitive and memory problems, and migraine headaches. 

The case went to trial in Lowndes County State Court on January 17, after a court-order mediation failed to resolve the dispute.  The physician sued the hospital based on the claim that the stool that injured him in the emergency room, despite the fact that he had used the same or same type chair hundreds of times before in the same or a similar setting was inappropriate for the type flooring in the operating room. Basically, the plaintiff claimed that the stool at question, despite its successful use by thousands of physicians in operating rooms around the country on a daily basis, was an unreasonable danger known to the hospital.  The key to the plaintiff’s argument was proving that the hard plastic casters on the stool at issue were not appropriate for the hard floor.  The claim was bolstered by testimony from other Georgia Medical Center staffers who had reported similar instances of people falling from the stools. South ed on carpets and soft surfaces, while softer rubber wheels are suitable for hard surfaces such as the one involved in this accident.  Expert testimony at trial, which was not overly complicated, centered on basic safety standards calling for hard casters or wheels such as those on the stool to be usnt.  The hospital’s reasonable defense, which unfortunately proved to be ineffective, was that “rolling stools roll”, and the physician “knew he had to be careful” because he had performed thousands of surgeries utilizing a rolling stool and was well acquainted with their use.

The plaintiff’s counsel cited lost wages in the area of four and a half million dollars ($4,500,000.00), and at closing asked the jury to award between that sum and thirteen million dollars ($13,000,000.00).  The defense counsel rightfully argued against any award at all.  Ultimately, the jury awarded ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00) in damages, but under Georgia’s apportionment statute, apportioned thirty percent (30%) of the liability to the physician for a final award of seven million dollars ($7,000,000.00).  The jury verdict came seven years to the day after the physician’s fall.   

Unfortunately, this is yet another example of the growing trend of out of control jury verdicts. 

Please do not hesitate to reach out to me if you have any questions or concerns about the above referenced matter or others.

Yours very truly,

William R. Johnson

wrjohnson-attorney-marietta-ga

Filed Under: client alert, News

Client Alert: There Has Been a Change to CMS’s Review of Zero-Dollar Workers’ Compensation Allocations Without Prior Notification

By mijs

There Has Been a Change to CMS’s Review of Zero-Dollar Workers’ Compensation Allocations Without Prior Notification

It has recently come to light that there have been procedural changes to the review Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) review process for Zero-Dollar Allocation Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Aside Arrangement (MSA) amounts, but no one was notified about the changes in advance. Vendors and claimants were confused by the sudden change in CMS procedure when Zero-Dollar Allocation MSAs claims that formerly were accepted suddenly were being denied.

CMS’s review of Zero-Dollar Allocation MSAs previously allowed for controverted claims to be considered if it included items such as the following:

  • Confirmation the claim was controverted, such as filing of a WC-3 in Georgia;
  • Confirmation that no medicals or indemnity was paid on the claim;
  • Supported by letters from attorneys or adjusters.

The recent procedural changes imposed by the CMS’ Workers’ Compensation Review Contractor called for denial of these controverted claims unless the claim was accompanied by:

  • A court order showing a denied claim, or
  • Medical records indicating that there would be no more medical treatment related to the work injury that the claim was based upon.

As a result, CMS has announced that as of October 31, 2016, CMS’ Workers’ Compensation Review Contractor will be returning to the former review procedure and that no changes will be made to the Zero-Dollar Allocation MSA review process until notice is properly published so that everyone affected by the change will be officially and formally put on notice. CMS’ Workers’ Compensation Review Contractor had changed how it was reviewing these types of claims without prior notification to those who would be affected by the procedural change.

There Is Potential That Changes Are On The Way

While CMS did not expressly indicate that there were plans to change the Zero-Dollar Allocation MSA review process in the future, in light of all the confusion recently, it begs the question that claimants should be reading between the lines. It is quite possible that the changes implemented without public notice are changes that CMS will implement in the future, making approval even more difficult to obtain.

Suggestions Going Forward

Anyone who has a Zero-Dollar Allocation MSA claim submitted to CMS, or plans to submit one in the near future, needs to be mindful that this glitch in the system could affect their claim. Despite CMS’s announcement to return to the old way of reviewing Zero-Dollar Allocation MSA claims, going forward, individuals who have a Zero-Dollar Allocation MSA claim might consider taking precautions when submitting their claim by:

  • Providing copies of treatment records from the treating physician in order to demonstrate to CMS that no further treatment for the worker’s injury or illness will be required in the future;
  • If there is no treating physician based on a controverted claim, a possible opinion from an IME physician to medically support that no treatment is related to the alleged work injury;
  • Obtaining a judicial ruling/court order once a hearing on the merits has been conducted concerning the compensability of the claim;
  • Instead of submitting a claim to CMS, choosing to finalize a strict compromise settlement in accordance with CMS guidance.

Providing these extra materials is in alignment with how the Workers’ Compensation Review Contractor was processing claims.

Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele has offices in eight locations including Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina, Kentucky and Florida with more than ninety skilled and experienced attorneys who are ready and available to help you. Please feel free to contact us. 

Filed Under: client alert, News

locations practice-areas all-attorneys

Contact Us

  • By submitting an inquiry through our website, no attorney-client relationship is created. An attorney-client relationship will only be created after speaking with and formally retaining an attorney in our firm who verifies in writing that he or she is handling your legal issue.

Resources

  • Publications
  • Videos
  • Locations
  • Events
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys

News Events

  • Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele has been ranked in the 2021 Edition of U.S. News
  • MIJS Co-sponsors the First Virtual Conference for the Alliance of Women in Workers’ Compensation
  • Managing Workers’ Compensation Claims For The Remote Workforce
  • MIJS Supports Spooktacular Chase 12th Annual 10/5k Race
  • National Estate Planning Awareness Week

Contact Us

If you are in need of an attorney,
click here to send us a message
or call one of our offices to speak
with an attorney.

Marietta, GA 770-429-1499
Knoxville, TN 865-692-9039
Brentwood, TN 615-425-7347
Jacksonville, FL 904-428-1465
Lexington, KY 859-309-0026
Santa Rosa Beach, FL 850-231-5995
Orlando, FL 407-367-6233
Harrisburg, PA 717-790-2854

  • Firm Profile
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
  • Locations
  • Videos
  • News
  • Publications
  • Clients
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright © 2021 · | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Moore Ingram Johnson & Steele, LLP